A few days ago, we described how the Queensland Police Service Weapons Licensing Branch appears to frown on the occupational use of pistols by primary producers while the Queensland Police regularly euthanise animals with Glocks.
It isn’t just the Police that frown. The Police Minister has described farmers using pistols to deal with pests and stock as cowboys. How did we get here?
Fortunately, we can get some idea from documents obtained under Queensland’s Right To Information Act.
“if their proposed use isn’t supported then the applications are very unlikely to be successful”
At some point in the recent past, this document was prepared:
“I propose that all staff assessing or following up on new applications and renewals for Concealable Firearms be encouraged to speak to applicants to let them know that Cat H applications will be looked at on a case by case basis and if their proposed use isn’t supported then the applications are very unlikely to be successful.”
After assessment by the Licencing Coordinator, if the application is not supported, applicants will be offered the opportunity to withdraw prior to being rejected.
Some applications get very special attention. The document goes on:
“There cannot be a blanket NO answer for any type of licence, each one must be judged on its merits, however some of the standards points that have been referred to are listed below.
Why would each case need a special phone call where Branch staff members ‘speak to applicants’? Is it because some special attention is going to be delivered?
“Enjoy our new, improved, special attention”
In documents that appear to be scripts for the Branch members making the ‘special attention’ phone calls, we find these gems:
“The CSIRO and other Commonwealth and State agencies, including the Queensland Government, have produced a number of ‘Model Codes of Practice’ for the destruction of livestock and feral animals. These documents indicate that in most cases the use of rifles of sufficient calibres should be used for humane destruction of injured or sick beasts.
Publications on humane destruction of feral pest animals are not supportive of the use of handguns due to the smaller calibres used and the lack of accuracy over distance both of which can contribute to the suffering of an animal.”
It is hard to understand why pistol calibres are said to be smaller than rifle calibres. There are plenty of pistol calibres in common use which are larger than many common rifle calibres. Despite that, the Branch seem keen to give you the impression that there is absolutely no scientific support for using pistols to euthanise animals. There is no mention of the joint Queensland Police and Department of Primary Industries study at Warwick 16 years ago. That study endorsed the Police Service Glock and its .40 calibre projectile for euthanising cattle. There is even a Police procedure for euthanising animals with Glocks.
Undeterred by these difficult facts, the apparent script continues with its helpful suggestions:
“Other methods of carrying long arm rifles have been developed in recent years for both motorbike and horseback, including scabbards, gun racks and break down ‘survival’ type rifles of smaller size. This counters an argument that on rural properties it is not practical to travel distances with long arms.”
“Any rejection will need to be declared in future dealings with Weapons Licensing”
The most telling part of this apparent script is the implied consequence for the farmer or occupational shooter receiving the special attention:
“Please keep in mind that any rejection will need to be declared in future dealings with Weapons Licensing is it [sic: it is] a question on most forms used by Weapons Licensing.”
You sent the Queensland Police a form and some money. You’re trying to work livestock or dispatch pests in pretty difficult conditions. A policeman phones you and says “Thanks for your time today.” And after some waffle he indicates they won’t be “supporting” the renewal of your existing license. Then he tells you that you can withdraw your application and dispose of your pistol(s). Or you continue your application for renewal and very likely face formal refusal. He tells you to keep in mind that you’ll have to deal with us again. It sounds like they’re saying: we’re in a position of power over you and we will remember this.
Why no public release?
When documents like the apparent proposal and script above are released, they are normally put on the online Disclosure Log for anyone to access. They don’t seem to contain anything confidential or personal. At the time of publication, they weren’t available online in the Disclosure Log (see application RTI/18362).
Police comment invited
On Monday we invited the Queensland Police Service to comment on a draft of this post by close of business Thursday 13 October 2016. We have received none.
Shooters Union Australia is a not for profit organisation which represents thousands of firearms owners and users across Australia. We are actively involved in the political scene, lobbying against the unfair, unreasonable and unconstitutional vilification of firearms owners at every level of government. Our aim is to work towards a co-operative system of effective gun control, and together we are affecting positive change on firearm legislation in Australia. Help us to change the social dialogue around firearms, firearms ownership and the shooters themselves.
Join us to help make a difference, stop discrimination and create a system of fair policies that support and protect. Click here to learn more about the advantages of Shooters Union membership.
Please freely share our message on social media: